Відео

You teach very very well! Thanks a lot!

Great!

time 1.20.30, in triple product: u.(v x w) = u1(v2w2-v3w2) + u2(v2w1-v1w2) + u3(v1w2-v2w1). instead of neglecting w terms. am i right or typo error.

I love your style so much, you always carefully consider the feeling of students, thanks a lot!

Been looking for this my whole adult life, so excited to go through all the lessons, thank you Doc. But why would you make all this available for free? I am not complaining though, love it.

we need to give damage parameter also , without giving this we are not able tom proceed

Very easy-to-understand and fun to watch =)) many jokes actually help to keep the lecture exciting! Thank a lot

Where can I get the pdf notes please

Hello Dr. Clayton, the psuedo time increment was calculated based on linear terms of Taylor series. I wanted to know, based on number of NR iteration how it is fixing increment size.

Thank you so much for this video.

superb! Can you please share Timoshenko beam as well?

Thank you so much for this. I feel i understand you more than my lecture times. Bless you

Your steps to solve the problems are very simple and clear. You don’t assume that people know already something. It is very important in teaching because student like me always need some refresher. Thanks for your help

Old, don't use anymore?

Thank you, Dr. Clayton. As an E.I.T. working in Ontario, I have found your videos extremely helpful. I never paid attention to this when I was taught steel design in my 4th year at school in Nova Scotia. Your content has been invaluable for my professional development. Keep up the great work!

your videos are such an eye-opener

It's 2024 and I'm happy u made this masterpiece 2yrs ago❤

Thanks..... your a life saver👑🙏

Why there is no "metric tensor"(g, G) explanation

Nice

well understood. thanks

this is worth a million likes

can u please share the ppt from which u are teaching

You are the best!

Simple and comprehensive.

You are my favorite instructor ever :)

you are the best Dr. Clayton. Thanks to you I understand continuum mechanics :)

You are the best!

You are the best!

What if i want to model a hyper elastic beam that has large deflection? What assumptions will i take then and how could i possibly make the calculations bearable? Thankyou

MUITO MUITO OBRIGADA!

Very very nice sir.

I like this guy man! the way he said pick ur poison for picking up textbook...lol

Keep up the good work my G

Hi Dr. Clayton, would you please add the lecture of concrete non plasticity to the FE playlist

Great explanation

In reality you will not have load displacement relationship curve for large deformation. How will NR work in that cse?

Thank you so much for this lecture video. It was extremely helpful. I have a question for you: Is there any chance you made a mistake in the Jacobian matrix definition? Equation showed is [dx/dXi dx/dEta ; dy/dXi dy/dEta] but, shouldn't it be [dx/dXi dy/dXi ; dx/dEta dy/dEta]? In advance, thank you for your answering.

I participated in a solid mechanics course when I was an undergraduate student in 2014. Actually, the first and second lectures remind me of ten years ago at school. I have been working as a CFD engineer since 2019 in the industry, but I am also trying to learn FEM because there are not as many job opportunities for CFD professionals. These lectures are actually ingenious and very helpful in expanding my career path. Thanks a lot.

I'm a Mechanical Engineer currently teaching. Good to refresh these topics, I actually finished them all. Haha

bro is saving my grades fr

these videos are definitely helping someone - me! I have a master's degree in physics but I want to make sure I'm not missing any lingo (such as 'torque' vs 'moment of force') plus I'm a bit rusty. Hoping to offer free tutoring online soon

Yoh, I wish I could give you a million subscribers... absolutely brilliant teaching 🥲